Participating vs Non-Participating Liquidation Preference

Angel investors typically have a lot of questions when it comes to participating vs non-participating liquidation preference.

What are the differences between these two types of preferences? How do they affect calculations and structuring deals? And what kind of tax implications should angel investors consider before making an investment decision?

In this blog post, we'll explore all these topics and more as we discuss participating vs non-participating liquidation preference in detail. We’ll look at how each type works, understand the calculations associated with them, learn about ways to structure deals and discover potential tax implications that come along with both types of preferences.

Ready for your next investment? Gain exclusive access to the best companies that Angel School has vetted. Our investors see success through our excellent deal flow and world-class diligence. We source hundreds of companies and invest selectively, with a fully transparent process. The best part? You are 100% in control, and Angel School is 100% with you. Invest only with full conviction. And with our 20% carry, we only profit when you do. That's right--no annual capital commitments. So join our growing global community, and see what a diversified deal flow and a talent for choosing good deals can do for you.

What is Liquidation Preference?

Liquidation preference is a contractual agreement between investors and companies that determines the order in which investors are paid out in the event of a liquidation or sale of the company. It can be used to protect investor interests, as well as provide additional capital for growth.

Liquidation preference gives investors priority over other shareholders when it comes to receiving proceeds from an exit event such as an acquisition or IPO. This means that if there are not enough funds available to pay all shareholders, then the liquidation preference will determine who gets paid first and how much they receive.

Investors typically receive their initial investment plus any accrued interest before other shareholders get anything.

Types of Liquidation Preference

There are two main types of liquidation preferences: participating and non-participating.

Participating preferences allow investors to share in any remaining proceeds after their initial investment has been returned, while non-participating preferences do not give them this right. In addition, some investments may have multiple tiers with different levels of protection depending on how much money was invested initially or what type of security was purchased (e.g., preferred stock vs common stock).

Advantages and Disadvantages of Liquidation Preference

The primary advantage of having a liquidation preference is that it provides extra protection for investors by ensuring they get paid back first if something goes wrong with the company’s finances or operations. On the other hand, it can also limit potential returns since only a certain amount will be allocated towards paying off creditors instead of being reinvested into growing the business.

Participating vs Non-Participating Liquidation Preference

There are two types of liquidation preferences: participating and non-participating.

Participating liquidation preference allows investors to receive their initial investment plus a share of any remaining proceeds from the sale or dissolution, while non-participating liquidation preference only allows them to receive their initial investment with no additional proceeds.

The benefit of participating liquidation preference is that it provides more protection for investors since they can get both their original investment back as well as a portion of any remaining proceeds from the sale or dissolution. On the other hand, non-participating liquidation preference offers less protection since it only guarantees that they will get their original investment back without any additional returns.

Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of return you expect from your investments over time. It is important to consider the level of risk that you are willing to take on when deciding between participating or non-participating liquidation preferences as they both offer different levels of protection and potential returns.

Calculations for Participating and Non-Participating Liquidation Preferences

When calculating participating vs non-participating liquidation preference values, you need to know three things:

1. Total proceeds available.
2. Investor's percentage ownership.
3. Investor's pre-money valuation (PMV).

With this information, you can determine what portion of proceeds each investor should expect based on their PMV and ownership percentage as well as whether they qualify for participation rights under the liquidity preference agreement.

For example, let’s say an investor has 10% ownership in a startup valued at $1 million prior to raising funds, with a participating liquidity preference agreement attached. If during exit proceedings there was $10 million available for distribution among all stakeholders involved, then this particular investor would be entitled to 10% x ($1M + $9M), which equals $990,000. This means they would get back both their original investment plus 90% of the remaining proceeds.

Tax Implications of Liquidation Preferences

For investors, participating liquidation preferences allow them to receive their initial investment plus a portion of any profits before other shareholders get paid out. This means that they will be taxed at ordinary income rates rather than capital gains rates which can result in higher taxes overall.

On the other hand, non-participating liquidation preferences do not provide this benefit as all profits are distributed equally among all shareholders regardless of their original investment amount so they will be subject to capital gains taxes instead.

For companies, participating liquidations mean that they must pay out more money upfront which could potentially limit their growth potential if there isn't enough cash flow available to cover these payments while still meeting other obligations such as payroll or rent costs.

When dealing with non-participating liquidation preferences, companies may find themselves paying out more money than necessary due to having multiple shareholders who each have an equal claim on any profits generated by the company.

Conclusion

When structuring an angel investment syndicate, it is important to understand the differences between participating vs non-participating liquidation preferences. Participating liquidation preference allows investors to receive a return of their original capital plus a share of any remaining proceeds from the sale or exit of the company while non-participating liquidation preference does not allow for this additional return.

It is important to consider both types when structuring deals as they have different tax implications and can affect how much money each investor receives in case of a sale or exit.

‍