Participating vs Non-Participating Liquidation Preferences

What is the difference between participating vs non participating liquidation preference? 

A participating liquidation preference means that an investor gets their initial investment back first, plus a percentage of any remaining proceeds. This is the more favorable type of preference for investors.

A non-participating liquidation preference means that an investor only gets their initial investment back, and does not receive any additional proceeds. This is less favorable for investors, but is more common.

In order to make things more relatable, let's demonstrate an example of participating vs non participating liquidation preference.

Let's say that there is a company that is being sold for $10 million. Investor A has a participating liquidation preference of $1 million, while Investor B has a non-participating liquidation preference of $2 million.

In this case, Investor A would get their $1 million back first, plus a percentage of the remaining $9 million. Investor B would only get their $2 million back, and would not receive any of the remaining $8 million.

That's why it's important to understand the difference between participating vs non participating liquidation preferences.

What Is a Liquidation Preference?

When it comes to startup investing, there are a lot of terms that get thrown around. One of those terms is liquidation preference.

But what exactly is a liquidation preference?

In simple terms, a liquidation preference is the order in which investors get paid back in the event of a sale or liquidation of a company. The higher up the preference list an investor is, the sooner they get paid.

There are two types of liquidation preferences: participating and non-participating.

If a company is sold for $100 million, and the investor has a participating preference of 1x, they would get their $1 million back, plus a pro-rata share of the remaining $99 million.

With a non-participating preference, the investor just gets their original investment back, regardless of how much the company is sold for. This means that the investor with a non-participating preference of 1x would just get their $1 million back, and would not receive any of the profits.

(Source)

The main advantage of a participating preference is that the investor gets to share in the profits if the company is sold for more than the original investment.

The downside is that, if the company is sold for less than the original investment, the investor may not get all of their money back.

The main advantage of a non-participating preference is that the investor is guaranteed to get their original investment back, no matter how much the company is sold for.

The downside is that the investor does not get to share in the profits if the company is sold for more than the original investment.

If you are planning to invest in a startup, which should you choose between participating vs non participating liquidation preference?

It depends on the situation.

If you're an investor who is risk-averse and just wants to make sure you get your money back, a non-participating preference is probably a better choice.

But if you're willing to take on more risk in exchange for the potential to make more money, a participating preference is probably a better choice.

Key Takeaway: With a participating preference, investors get their original investment back plus a share of the profits; with a non-participating preference, investors just get their original investment back.

How Do These Preferences Affect Investors' Returns?

As an investor, you always want to receive the highest return on your investment.

But what happens when there's more than one investor involved in a startup?

That's when things like participating vs non participating liquidation preference come into play.

As the names suggest, participating preference means that the investor will receive their money back first, plus a percentage of any additional proceeds. Non-participating preference, on the other hand, means that the investor will only receive their original investment back, no matter how much the company is sold for.

So, which is better?

If the company is sold for a low price, then non-participating preference is better because you at least get your money back.

But if the company is sold for a high price, then participating preference is better because you get a cut of the profits.

It's important to understand the different types of liquidation preferences when you're investing in a startup.

If you want to maximize your return, participating preference is the way to go.

However, if you're more risk-averse, non-participating preference may be a better choice.

Ultimately, it's up to you to decide which type of preference is right for you.

No matter what you choose, make sure you do your research and understand the risks involved.

Pros and Cons of Participating vs Non Participating Liquidation Preference

As an entrepreneur, you will likely encounter a variety of different types of investors, each with their own preferences around how they want to structure their investment.

One key area of negotiation is around the liquidation preference, which outlines how proceeds will be distributed in the event of a sale or other exit.

Here's a quick overview of the pros and cons.

Participating Liquidation Preferences

Pros:

• Allows investors to participate in upside beyond their initial investment.
• Can help align the interests of investors and entrepreneurs.
• Is more flexible than non-participating preferences, so can be tailored to the specific deal.

Cons:

• May give investors too much control over the company.
• Can be complex to understand and calculate.

Non-Participating Liquidation Preferences

Pros:

• Simple and easy to understand
• Gives investors a defined return on their investment.
• Can help to avoid conflicts between investors and entrepreneurs.

Cons:

• Does not allow investors to participate in the upside beyond their initial investment.
• Can be inflexible and may not be the best fit for all deals.

At the end of the day, there is no right or wrong answer when it comes to choosing between participating and non-participating liquidation preferences. It really depends on the specific deal and what makes the most sense for all parties involved.

Key Takeaway: There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to choosing between participating and non-participating liquidation preferences, it depends on the specific deal.

FAQs About Participating vs Non-Participating Liquidation Preferences

What is participating and non-participating preference shares?

Participating: Participating preference stock holders are entitled to both dividend payments and any leftover profit.

Non-participating: These stock holders do not gain any profit from the company but receive dividend payments.

What does non-participating liquidation preference mean?

The non-participating liquidation preferences of the preferred shareholders allow them to share in profits when the company is sold but protect them from losses if the company exits at a lower value.

What is participating vs non-participating?

A participating policy makes the insured eligible to receive a share of the insurance company’s profits. These shares are called bonuses or dividends.

In non-participating policies, the profits are not shared and no dividends are paid to the policyholders.

What is a non-participating preference?

Preferred stocks are a type of security that pays a pre-determined amount of annual interest to its holder. This usually means that the holder of the stock has to sign a document stating the minimum amount of yearly return they will receive.

Conclusion

There are pros and cons to participating vs non participating liquidation preferences, so it's important to understand the difference before making an investment.

If you're looking for stability and a guaranteed return, then a non-participating preference may be the better choice.

However, if you're willing to take on more risk in exchange for potentially higher rewards, then a participating preference could be the way to go.

‍